Atlassian Corporation Plc is a software company that develops products for software developers, project managers, and content management. In 2002, Atlassian released its flagship product, Jira – a project and issue tracker.
Meanwhile, Asana is a project management tools that officially launched for free out of beta in November 2011 and commercially in April 2012. Asana was founded in 2008 by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and ex-Google-and-Facebook engineer Justin Rosenstein.
Jira and Asana are basically two different types of project management software. Asana designed to improve team collaboration and work management on all project types in a simple way. While Jira designed specifically for software teams that cover all aspects of the software development life cycle. So, Jira can be somewhat complex and confusing to users who are not familiar with software development projects.
Table of contents
Designed specifically for software teams, JIRA Software combines powerful developer tool integrations with the most important elements of agile development. Its features like flexible Scrum and Kanban boards, and real-time reporting. Also, it offers custom forms and fields to collect and map relevant information, from features to bugs to general tasks of any kind. In addition, it includes JIRA Query Language, which offers search functionality to search and sort for tickets and creates custom filters.
Meanwhile, Asana helps you organize and plan all of the tasks related to a specific initiative, goal, or big piece of work. In Asana, you can visualize projects as a list or board, as well as on a calendar or Timeline. There are also custom fields to add additional relevant information.
For comparison with Jira, Asana also provides agile management tools for managing software development projects. Its features including bug tracking, sprint planning, product feedback, product launches, and product roadmap. In addition, this platform also has the ability to integrate with developer tools for end-to-end traceability such as Bitbucket and Github. Below is a comparison table of feature availability at Jira and Asana.
|Project Planning & Scheduling|
|Setting priorities and deadlines||√||√|
|Resources & Workload Management||√|
|Support Agile Methodologies||√||√|
|Attach files to the task||√||√|
|Progress Tracking / Status||√||√|
|Project Financial Management|
|Payments / Billing||√|
|Integration with Accounting Systems||√|
In conclusion, the functionality offered by Jira is better than Asana. However, Jira requires good learning and is not a very light tool. There are some activities are tough tasks and require good knowledge of agile practices. Setup project/workflow creation, user management, etc, for instance. Thus, with a lot of capacities comes a large group of assignments to learn, especially for new clients.
In Jira, users are able to integrate the software with developer tools for end-to-end traceability such as Bitbucket Cloud, Github, Atlassian Cloud Applications, and more. In addition, Atlassian also offers many apps through their Marketplace to integrate Jira with other software such as Slack, Tempo Time Tracking, and many more.
Meanwhile, Asana has integrations with other SaaS tools, including Gmail, Slack, Microsoft Outlook, Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, Zapier, Zendesk, and many more. It also provides Open API that allows customers or third-party developers to build on the Asana platform and customize Asana to the unique way their teams work.
Ease of Use
If we compare Jira vs Asana based on ease of use, Asana is easier to use than Jira. Asana has intuitive features and easy to use but some function is not simple enough. For example, there are no task status options by default which is one of the most important things in project management. In Asana, you must create task status options using the “Custom Fields” feature if you need it.
Meanwhile, Jira is a very detail-oriented application that can sometimes become quite cumbersome. For example, the process of creating and resolving tickets can sometimes feel even longer than completing the task itself. Furthermore, it is difficult, if not impossible to close a ticket if you are not the creator. Therefore, project managers need to carry significant oversight as task statuses change. Furthermore, many users said that the user interface acts a bit confusing sometimes.
Jira Software has two pricing options for its cloud-hosted services. Prices depend on the maximum number of users. There’s a plan that’s a $10 monthly flat fee for teams with up to 10 users, and another that costs $7 per month (per user) for teams with 11 to 100 users. Discounts are available for subscribers who pay annually. Unfortunately, a lot of features required additional apps purchase on Atlassian Marketplace. Therefore, some users said that Jira is prohibitively expensive for small companies.
Meanwhile, Asana has four pricing options — Free, Premium, Business, and Enterprise. The Premium plan costs $9.99 per month (per member) when billed annually, Business plan costs $19.99 per month (per member) when billed annually, and the Enterprise plan requires a call with the sales team for a custom quote. The main differences between the plans include the number of team members allowed, features, priority support, security, and custom branding.
So in our opinion, Jira is cheaper than Asana. However, Asana offers a free plan that allows up to 15 users to collaborate on unlimited projects and tasks. While Jira doesn’t have a free version on their plan.
Pros and Cons
|Pros||Jira is another powerful, agile development tool that gives you everything you need to track projects, squash bugs, and deliver great software. It is very easy to track team tickets as well as display everything on a board that conforms to your team’s workflow (scrum, kanban, etc). Also, from an administrative standpoint setting up project permissions and integrating it with other systems was simple.||Asana has intuitive features, easy-to-use, and flexible enough which can be used for many project types. It also good free project management software that allows up to 15 users to collaborate on unlimited projects and tasks. Furthermore, Asana can be integrated with many other systems and provides an Open API for software and scripts to read information from inside Asana, input information from outside Asana, and automatically react when things change. And the last interesting thing about this software is a mobile app that makes you easily organize your project on the go.|
|Cons||The bad thing that I found in JIRA is that the software is not really easy to use and take much time to explore all features.||Files can’t be attached to the comments. The task can’t be assigned to two or more peoples. There is no Gantt chart view, but Asana has a timeline view for an alternative.|
When it comes to project management software, you have a lot of options. There are advanced online solutions, like Asana. There are simpler methods, like Trello. But when you’re looking for powerful, self-hosted project management—especially for software development—JIRA is hard to beat. It’s ideal for software developers. But any department can use its project management capabilities effectively. It’s great for any team that needs to collaborate and work through issues in an orderly manner.
Meanwhile, Asana is also one of the most popular Project Management Software in the world. It is suitable for different project types such as marketing project, product launch, software development, and many more. It also a good choice for you who are looking for free project management software which the number of projects and tasks are not limited.